AT A GLANCE

What should you know about Hunter?

Hunter connects lead and email research, address verification and outreach campaigns with API and MCP access to company and contact data.

Free plan
Yes ↗
API
Not verified
Self-hosting
Not verified

These facts reflect linked documentation, not a hands-on test. A free plan can have usage limits; an unverified feature is not a confirmed absence. Check pricing and limits · How we review

toolkompass.io VERDICT

Our editorial assessment

3.9 / 5Editorial ratingDocument review

Lead research · toolkompass.io editorial team · 11/11/2026

A coherent combination of email research, verification and outreach. Credit and sending limits are documented; security information mainly describes operator access, while team configuration should be reviewed separately.

Editorial assessment of the documented software offering. No business relationship disclosed. No hands-on product test or assessment of the company's creditworthiness. The assessment covers publicly documented properties. Usability, reliability and result quality have not been tested in practice.

Fit for the use case40 % weighting

Email lookup, address verification and campaigns suit B2B prospecting. The feature chain is clear; match quality and actual deliverability have not been checked against an independent target audience.

Hunter – official product overview ↗
4 / 5
Workflow & integration25 % weighting

The app, API and MCP enable research and programmatic processing. Campaigns extend the workflow; the number of connected email accounts and recipient limits determine actual usable capacity.

Hunter – official product overview ↗ · Plans & pricing • Hunter ↗
4 / 5
Costs & limits20 % weighting

Subscriptions, credit packages and expiration rules are explained separately. Monthly credits expire, while annual credit is available upfront; search and verification needs should therefore be estimated together before selecting a package.

Plans & pricing • Hunter ↗
4 / 5
Control & operation15 % weighting

The security page documents role-based operator access, MFA and logging of critical changes. These are clear operational controls; an equally detailed customer-side team permissions matrix has not been examined in these sources.

Security Policy • Hunter ↗
3.5 / 5
Criteria, weighting & independence

Fits Hunter for your project?

Suitable for

B2B sales teams

Less suitable for

Not yet sufficiently reviewed.

The classification is derived from the claims below and is not an independent quality assessment.

Features at a glance

  • Finds business email addresses and verifies existing addresses.

    Provider documentation · no hands-on test · Source ↗ · Review status 11/10/2026
  • Enables outreach campaigns and programmatic access to contact and company data.

    Provider documentation · no hands-on test · Source ↗ · Review status 11/10/2026

Documented strengths

Our editorial verdict presents strengths, limitations and evidence.

Drawbacks and limitations

Our editorial verdict presents strengths, limitations and evidence.

Pricing & billing model

Check price. No confirmed plan amounts available.

Review status 11/10/2026. No price guarantee. For paid plans, check tax and usage terms in the source.

Integrations

No confirmed information

Free plan

  • The provider offers a free plan.

    Provider documentation · no hands-on test · Source ↗ · Review status 11/10/2026

Privacy information

No confirmed information

Support

No confirmed information

Sources & review status

We update our lists regularly. Changes are reviewed editorially; the review status of each detail remains visible. We explain the review process in our Methodology.

“Evidenced” refers to the specific claim. It means neither an independent product test nor a security audit.

  1. Hunter – official product overviewhttps://hunter.io/ · retrieved on 11/10/2026
  2. Plans & pricing • Hunterhttps://hunter.io/pricing · retrieved on 11/11/2026
  3. Security Policy • Hunterhttps://hunter.io/security-policy · retrieved on 11/11/2026

Trademark: Original source ↗ · for recognition only; no partnership or endorsement by the trademark owner.

More candidates for this use case

Shared category, not an automatic promise of equivalence. Check feature scope and research status.